All guides

Source Verification Policy

Source context helps players understand which Heartopia notes are stronger and which still need another check.

Fan-made guide Last updated Live details may change after official updates

Evidence order

Official notices and live in-game evidence are stronger than undated reposts or summaries. Dated screenshots and repeatable player checks can support practical guide details when official documentation is unavailable.

Strong evidence

A guide note is stronger when the evidence supports the exact claim and matches the current game context.

Reviewed source

A reviewed source can be useful, but live in-game behavior may still need a player check.

Community reports

Community reports are helpful when they include enough context, date information, and repeatable details.

Changing details

Codes, routes, rewards, values, events, and item notes should stay cautious when they may be outdated, incomplete, or contradicted.

Report a source problem

To report inaccurate information, outdated sources, missing sources, or gameplay-data problems, use the Contact form or email contact@heartopguide.com.

Correction policy

Heartop avoids fake certainty. If a code, route, event, item, or gift note changes, use the correction links so the page can stay useful.

FAQ

Quick wiki answers for players who need the next route, source policy, or correction path.

What counts as strongly supported on Heartop?

It means the exact guide claim has strong supporting evidence, though live game details can still change later.

How are community reports used?

A player observation can support a guide when it includes enough context, date information, and repeatable details.

What happens to incomplete details?

Incomplete or outdated details are omitted or explained cautiously instead of being presented as confirmed facts.